How in the world I manage to pick out the wrong sender amazes me. I did get lucky, however, and appreciate your confirming my own results in comparing my Mamiya 6 vs Canon 6.3mp results of 'prox a year ago. I've, also, had the 'experience' of seeing the Mamiya 7II work of a pro friend and I can't imagine finer images from that format. Scanning of MF is a bit more of an issue and the files can be somewhat cumbersome in PS.
Thanks, Shel. Jack --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not Rob, and I've never owned a pentax 6x7. However, I have shot > a few > 6x7 rolls in my day, using slide film, and there is no comparison > between > the results from a 6x7 negative and that from the current lineup of > Pentax > DSLR's. The big negative wins hands down wrt tonality and detail and > subtlety. > > FWIW, I processed Rob's negs from a trip he took a few years ago. He > was > using a Mamiya 6x7 rangefinder for some of the negs. Gorgeous! > > Some time try shooting a landscape with a 6x9 .... compare those > results to > a DSLR <ROTFL> > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jack Davis > > > How would you compare the resolution of the Pentax 67 and istD? > With > > Velvia 100F, for example? > > I expect some such answer as; "there is no comparison". I recently > sold > > a Mamiya 6 outfit largely due to problematic focusing (especially > with > > the 150mm lens) and rangefinder inconveniences. When I did my job, > the > > images were magnificent. > > I've often thought of owning a Pentax 67, and would like to read > your > > personal thoughts on its performance and handling. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
