Aaron,

Where do you get it locally? I've seen prints on it, but due to a lack of source, haven't had a chance to see my prints on it, and I really want to.

-Adam




Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I have a really nice monitor and I agree -- even prints made on my "old" 7500 
knock the socks off of looking at the monitor.

I also second Adam's recommendation of the Hahnemühle photo rag, a gorgeous paper.  
All my b&w Trinidad 24 x 36s were printed on that stuff.

I still don't know what I'm doing for my show in May (I've been distracted, 
doing other people's shows for May, which is the big Contact photography month 
here in Toronto), but chances are it'll be on that paper.

-Aaron

-----Original Message-----

From:  Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj:  thots on printing and prints
Date:  Fri Mar 3, 2006 10:13 am
Size:  3K
To:  SeePhoto Camera Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,   PDML <[email protected]>

Getting ready for the exhibition, I've been printing up a storm the past week or two.

The HP 7960 has done yeoman service to print announcement postcards (for the hundred or so I need, it's cheaper than I've found as yet to print decent quality color at a print service), business cards, exhibit tags, all manner of collateral things. I'm surprised at the quality I'm getting out of it as well as the economy ... I've hardly touched the two color cartridges, barely touched the black ink tank, and used about 1/2 of a grayscale cart to output everything so far.

It's operated flawlessly and quickly. The only hitch I've encountered so far has been the juggling of paper due to the u-turn paper path, particularly for the announcement post cards. I've been unsuccessful at making a custom paper size that would print the cards in one run, so each sheet (two cards per sheet) gets run through two times to print the addressing information on upper and lower cards, and then once again to print the announcement on both.

The Epson R2400 is making the final presentation prints. It also has operated flawlessly and with extreme consistency. I've consumed one whole set of ink carts in the making of perhaps 160 prints from 5x7 to A3 in size. I'm very glad I bought this printer.

I did some testing with Fine Art Velvet vs Epson Enhanced Matte papers. There's no question whatever that the Fine Art Velvet is a nicer paper, producing a more brilliant result, but I found that with suitable minor adjustments to the tonal curve I can produce results that are so nearly as good on Epson Enhanced Matte, once you put both behind glass with a matte, that I am producing the show prints on EEM. (My plan is to provide Fine Art Velvet prints on orders rather than for the exhibit itself.)

This allows me to use automation more effectively since I can stack load the printer for the show prints and reduces production costs substantially. I wrote actions for Photoshop which automate printing three different sizes of prints for the whole set. I must be getting lightheaded at having this stuff come out because I'm getting a thrill out of seeing a very nice, fully finished stack of 20 custom- cut 5x7s pop out of the printer in a half hour or so.

I produced three sets like this so far and have been using one of them to help organize and arrange the photos. And let me tell you, there is such a huge difference between looking at a nice print and looking at a photo on even an excellent computer screen. The tactile qualities of the paper, the micro interaction of the surface texture with the ink and image, the dynamics of handling the print ... Although I love looking at photographs on a good computer screen, there's simply nothing like a good print. And an modest size print, something in the 5x7 to 11x14 range, is a much more intimate viewing experience than the big ones too.

fun stuff. I'm in the bomb run now, waiting for the clouds to clear. There's a lot of work yet to do before Sunday when I do the installation, but it's all getting done in an efficient manner without rushing. This is fun.

Godfrey
   - "Ramsey" - http://www.gdgphoto.com


Reply via email to