Ahh... the "running around" cameras. The phrase has a nice ring to it. :-)
Tom C.
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Kodak KAF 10010 Sensor
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:25:00 -0500
The studio market aren't concerned with write speeds and will put up with
sensors that need multiple pops or long exposures (like "scanning backs").
They're okay with being chained to a computer.
So the 22MP is probably no good for "running around" cameras.
-Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Kodak KAF 10010 Sensor
Date: Fri Mar 3, 2006 11:37 am
Size: 673 bytes
To: [email protected]
I read it as the 645D will be the 18MP sensor not the 16MP.
However the 22MP sensor is meant for the "traditional commercial and studio
photography market". Whats with that?
Tom C.
>From: Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Kodak KAF 10010 Sensor
>Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:28:47 -0500
>
>
>On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>>"A 16mp (KAF-16802CE) has been designed at a square 1:1 aspect ratio as
>>well as a 22mp (KAF-22000CE) for the traditional commercial and studio
>>photography market".
>
>
>So the 645D will produce square images? Where's the fun in that?
>
>Bob
>
