Colin J wrote:
Paul,
You might find it amusing but it is completely
and utterly pointless.
[snip]
What the List really needs is effective
moderation that would curtail childish nonsense
long before it gets to this stage. Until that
happens, Pentax would be wasting their time
listening to us.
A) Colin found it pointless but Paul found it amusing (so did I;
but I like a bit of pointless amusement). That, in itself, is
sufficient reason to reject moderation.
B) Why should I care whether or not Pentax is listening to us (on
the list)? (And if I wanted to tell Pentax something, I would
write to them.)
C) The discussion proves again (if there were doubt) that any
technical thread, if it continues for sufficient time, will
ultimately split and morph into the "What Pentax is doing
right/wrong" and "Why digital/film is better than film/digital"
threads.
Keith McG
