Just to be clear, I use the word "fine" in reference to a file setting (***) and not as a comment about my photography. =)
Jack --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As long as the exposure was on the mark and the scenes you shot > weren't > > too difficult with contrast, you should have decent pictures. > > Jack, If you're background is slides, you should have little problem > producing good images from fine jpegs. > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: MP vs MB > > > > Presuming the camera was set to full resolution and JPEG *** (Fine) > > > quality, that sounds about right. > > As long as the exposure was on the mark and the scenes you shot > weren't > > too difficult with contrast, you should have decent pictures. > > > > Godfrey > > > > > > On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > >> Group, > >> Just shot 9 fine jpg images which yielded files in the 'prox range > of > >> 2.5mb to 3.5mb. Shot no RAW. > >> I know that there was a discussion on this topic several months > ago, > >> but what might I expect in the way of mb with such a file setting? > >> Local photo shop has a few DL's and offered one to play with. I > shot a > >> few frames which they transferred to a CD and gave it to me to > piddle > >> with. > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
