On Mar 17, 2006, at 11:41 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:46:34AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:12 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:37:55AM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:15, John Francis wrote:
Oh, I didn't *pay* for my Treo. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't
have one if the cost was coming out of my pocket. After all,
I don't have a Dell Axxim 51 (or whatever model it is) with
that nice 640x480 display (Treos are square, 240x240).
320x320 on the Treo 650, please.
How interesting. I wonder whether that was a Microsoft decision
to make the 700w have the same resolution as most of the other new
square-screen phones.
How would the design of the later 700w be affecting the design of the
650 developed a year before?
It wouldn't, silly. But Microsoft could have decided that they
wanted the 700w to be 240x240 to (as I said) match other smartphones.
Ah, I misunderstood what you meant. So the 700w has less resolution
than the 650?
That's dumb.
Godfrey
