On Mar 18, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Since when does the fisheye effect need to be obvious or tiresome? Putting modesty aside, I could display for your consideration:http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3760021
Yes, it's a good shot and shows that excellent work not obviously driven by fishyness is possible. Here are two favorites with the zeni I posted last year:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/46.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/25p.htm Godfrey
