Hi Rick
the original shots do indeed look quite dark in the shadows but overall I
prefer them over your adjustments.
The originals show the colours more pleasing and very saturated while your
versions look a bit washed out here on my
Nanoa/Eizo CRT monitors. Maybe you should adjust curves/brightness only for
certain regions of the image or use the shadow/highlight tool of Photoshop?

I know that they will look even darker on most of the LCD screens I have
seen,
maybe that's one of the reasons.
I often wonder how people can enjoy photographs on a notebook screen or
medium priced LCD, they look so incredible dark and mostly have a bluish
cast too **if** you know the original.

others will know the answer to your real question ;-)
greetings from a film user
Markus





>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 3:44 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: ist D exposure question
>>
>>
>>Today I was finally able to do some shooting with my
>>new-to-me ist D.  I used the highest-quality jpeg
>>setting (raw will have to wait a bit).
>>
>>Most of the pix were nicely exposed, but some of them
>>were badly underexposed, even though the scenes didn't
>>seem especially challenging and no exposure
>>compensation was set.
>>
>>Two examples are here, along with copies whose levels
>>I adjusted in PE2 to show that the information is
>>really there:
>>
>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=583164
>>
>>(ist D, DA16-45, iso 200, multipattern metering, f/11
>>@ 1/180)
>>
>>Can anyone tell me what's happening?  Is this typical?
>>
>>Otherwise, the camera handles nicely, and I can use it
>>with my glasses on (a very nice thing indeed).  TTL
>>flash exposures hoover, as others have noted.  There's
>>dust on the sensor, but our cats make the house so
>>dusty that I don't want to try to clean it here.
>>
>>Rick
>>
>>
>>
>>http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>

Reply via email to