--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shel, The pix are here: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=583164 The "adjusted" pix weren't adjusted for the sake of beauty (they're pretty washed out), but rather to see if there was any data in the blocked-up foreground. Glad you walked away from the accident, BTW! My parents were saved by seat belts when I was young, and I've been a "believer" ever since! Rick > > Got a link to the pics in question? > > I was actually commenting to Tim on his suggestion > to use the editing > software to correct for and adjust exposure errors. > I think we've both > been around photography long enough to know that > good exposure in the > camera is the best option. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Date: 3/20/2006 8:18:50 AM > > Subject: RE: ist D exposure question > > > > Shel, > > > > Well, I've been shooting slides almost exclusively > for > > 40 years, and have been using a PZ-1 and PZ-1p for > the > > last 12 years; so I think I generally have a good > > handle on exposure, and I =thought= I would have a > > good handle on how a Pentax multipattern meter > would > > behave. I usually use spotmetering a lot, but for > > quick grabs use multipattern, and was surprised by > > these exposures. > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
