Brian, thanks.
Just out of curiosity, where was the camera position?
Most of the waterfall was positioned above the camera location & had
approximately a 30 degree slope towards me.
I refocused each of the seven images as I scanned downward. The f32 had a
significant impact on the clarity of this image.
I haven't tried my hand seriously at panoramas, either horizontally or
vertically. I'll definitely be rectifying this shortly.
I probably wouldn't be doing them either but while in Denali, I witnessed
the ease of use of the Arcsoft Panoramaker software & the results were
simply amazing. I've done a number of panos since then with results that are
truly rewarding.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - For Shel
Ken
Absolutely wonderful!
Just out of curiosity, where was the camera position? I'd assume that
for best results, the camera should be aligned with the vertical half
way point of the falls.
I haven't tried my hand seriously at panoramas, either horizontally or
vertically. I'll definitely be rectifying this shortly.
Cheers,
Brian
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
--
Quoting Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Shel commented he hadn't "ever knowingly seen a vertical pano
before".
So here's one for Shel.
IMHO, there's a very good reason - they don't lend them self to
monitor
presentation.
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
One of several panos I did in Denali NP in 04.
Seven images taken with the *istD, 70-210mm F, stitched with
ARCSOFT
Panoramaker 3.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks in advance.
Kenneth Waller
