On 3/26/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Colin J wrote: > > > I was merely expressing my opinion. It differs > > from yours. I respect yours but I don't agree > > with it. If that bothers you, then I'm sorry for > > you, because people should be able to hold > > differing opinions about the same thing without > > becoming offended. > > You didn't say "my opinion is that digital is bad and chemical is > good", you said that one IS bad and one IS good. > > If you're just speaking of your own perception, don't phrase it as an > absolute and you won't have to argue it. > > -Aaron
WTF? Colin didn't say anything of the sort. Jesus your argumentative. Am I reading the same posts as you? Quit paraphrasing other peoples comments with your spin on them. I don't think one person has said film and chemicals are better than the digital process, or visa versa, just that they have a personal preference. Do we all now need to get lawyers to proof read our posts and correct them to ensure that our personal opinions are clearly and unambiguously outlined before we comment on anything? Frank? How much to have you on retainer? Dave -- "All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." - Spike Milligan
