Hi Paul,

Where is this?  I don't recognize it - it doesn't appear to be the one on
Square Lake near Telegraph.  And are you saying you'll be doing a show
there? Keep the good work coming....

Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: The Pond

Thanks for looking and commenting, Kostas and all the others who have 
replied.
No, the pier itself is the only access. The pond is actually part of a 
stream. It's formed by the damming effect of some fallen trees. In the 
summer I come here to shoot dragonflies. I'm going to have to do a 
color summer shot of this same area now that I have a sufficiently wide 
lens. It's very pretty with many aquatic plants and fallen tree trunks, 
but I never had a lens wide enough to cover it adequately.
Paul
Paul
On Mar 26, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> On Mar 26, 2006, at 5:19 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" 
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Subject: PESO: The Pond
>>>>> I set a new personal record for filter extravagance and bought an 
>>>>> 77mm R72 for my DA 12-24/4. Shot a little pond this morning. It's 
>>>>> at 12mm, f11, 4 second exposure.
>>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4260009&size=lg
>>>> Sure conveys a feeling of crispness.
>>> Is it snow or is it IR? I think it is a great picture, despite the 
>>> central feature.
>>
>> There's a light snow cover. I shot some without the central pier as 
>> well using different camera positions. To me, the pier makes it more 
>> than another pond picture.
>
> Thanks for the answer. I agree the pier is quite a feature. I was 
> suggesting (without of course knowing the circumstances) that if it 
> was on one side pointing towards the centre it could have been another 
> interesting shot. Not sure if it is possible.
>
> Kostas
>



Reply via email to