On 3/27/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, I object to being told that I am not creative, but instead a > technician. Why do you feel I should not be insulted by that? Here are the > relevant passages, word for word: > --- > Photography is a craft. Digital imaging is a > science. Working at a craft is infinitely more > satisfying, and I think it's a lot more fun. > Working at science is just a chore. > > I suspect that each is supported by a different > type of person. There are many techies who love > digital, and will thrive on Photoshop and all the > things they can do with it. > --- > > -Aaron > > -----Original Message----- > > Wrom: BUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPN > Subj: Re: Bailing out. > Date: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:00 am > Size: 1K > To: [email protected] > > On 3/26/06, Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You didn't say "my opinion is that digital is bad and chemical is > > good", you said that one IS bad and one IS good. > > > > If you're just speaking of your own perception, don't phrase it as an > > absolute and you won't have to argue it. > > > > -Aaron
Fair enough Aaron. But at no time has anyone said that "one IS bad and one IS good", or that one is any less creative than the other. Dave -- "All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." - Spike Milligan
