On 3/28/06, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
> > Bob Shell wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, frank theriault wrote:
> >>
> >>> However, every time I say how I'm more than satisfied with film, that
> >>> I like the results it produces, and that I like the process (at least
> >>> my involvement in the process - or lack of involvement as the case may
> >>> be), someone jumps in to tell me how much better digital is, and what
> >>> a luddite I am and how can I say that film is better than digital?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It's meaningless to say one is better than the other without
> >> including the all important "for what?".
> >>
> >> I'm working on a book project right now that will ultimately have
> >> four hundred or more photos. I can't imagine the darkroom hours it
> >> would take to do that with film. Well actually I can imagine it,
> >> since I did books with lots of photos back in those days, but I
> >> measured the time to do a book in years back then. Today publishers
> >> want books done in months. Since the maximum repro size of any one
> >> photo will be 4 X 6 at 300 dpi, any digital SLR would be far more
> >> than adequate. So for this project I don't think there can be any
> >> argument at all that digital is better.
> >>
> >> Bob
> >
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > Once again, it depends on the subject matter. Any old Digital SLR
> > might not have the dynamic range of C-41, or produce the 'look' of
> > old-fashioned B&W film.
> >
> > And with the advent of film scanners, the darkroom hours can be safely
> > ignored if you so choose, just scan and then it's just like using
> > digital output. The advantage for you on the book project is after the
> > capture stage. Digital post-production is far more time efficient than
> > darkroom work. Digital capture is somewhat more time efficient, but
> > not all that significantly for RAW if you've got a good workflow down
> > (I lose about 1/2 hour a roll by shooting film over digital).
> >
> > Personally, I shoot film, print digitally, because I can't get the
> > look I like shooting digitally or printing in a darkroom and I enjoy
> > the process more. Might be lack of skill (I'm barely competent in the
> > darkroom), might be just that certain mediums are more suited to
> > producing certain results.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> >
> I haven't been following this thread from the start, so this may be
> superfluous. Have we all forgotten the chemical stink? The sloppy dishes
> of developer, stop bath and fixer and the rest for colour? Never mind
> how careful you are there is always spillage -- especially with a dish
> 20" x 24" big. The acetic acid stop bath used for B&W is nasty, the
> developer and other chemicals (for colour) are carcinogenic. The
> combination with stale air is almost narcotic. The dim yellow light, or
> more often no light at all? Emerging after hours in this stinking
> chemical dungeon into the daylight where you are forced to wear dark
> glasses or see nothing. Gloves with holes that leak. Tongs that don't
> grip the paper properly? Stains on your jeans, shirt, shoes, flesh.
> Washing, drying or glazing? Prints that stick to the glazing sheets? Or
> those that go brown on the drum because it gets far too hot when the
> thermostat fails. The dust on the glass carriers in the enlarger. The
> heat from the lamps. Trying to focus accurately when the light is not
> bright enough because the negative is thick? Finally pouring all the
> solutions back into bottles or down the drain. Cleaning the bench
> vacuuming the floor trying to get rid of dust. We didn't all have fine
> air-filtered and conditioned darkrooms with film drying cabinets. Or
> automatic exposure controlled colour enlargers and C-41 developing
> machines. Spotting prints? What a relief to no longer have to mess with
> all this. This is all out of order but you'll get what I mean.
>
> Don
>
> --
>
> Dr E D F Williams
> www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/
> personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/
> 41660 TOIVAKKA – Finland - +358400706616
>
>
Heretic.  <g>

--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com

--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman

Reply via email to