Dario Bonazza wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And the WP/W-series "periscope" lens is a lot better than the one in
the S-series Optios.
No viewfinder, sorry.
Dario
Two things, Dario.
What do you mean "better?" Better resolution, or what? Better in what
way?
Escellent! I've seen this test area before, and it works well for such a
display.
I did appreciate the tests. Any chance you used a tripod for the more sharp
images?
I mean this:
Optio S60:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/S60_50_35mm_F2.6.JPG
This is a bad picture, quite obviously due to focusing problems.
However, I find this to be rather common among S-series cameras.
Okay, but truthfully, I don't experience it with my S4...
I'll see what I can do to duplicate the conditions with my S4 and compare the
results. Might be interesting. I would compare mine with the S6 image you show
below, ased on iamges I'vee taken before.
I'm open to the possibility that I might learn mine is not all that great,
too, but...we'll see.
By the way, I DO intend to use a tripod! An S4 is pretty light, essentially no
inertia, and my hold is not as rock-steady as it once was.
One question please, choosing the S6, what is the "50" in the line:
S6_50_35mm_F2.8? You have that designation in the others too, and I'm not
certain what it means.
keith
Optio S6:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/S6_50_35mm_F2.8.JPG
This is a lot better, mainly thanks to better focusing. However, I have
the feeling that the new generation lens of the S6 to be better than the
older S-series lens.
Optio WP:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/WP_50_35mm_F3.3.JPG
This is the good one.
Dario
