On 29/3/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed: >Does it not seem curious that the article doesn't mention what damage Kodak >is allegedly doing to their customer's files? I read the article twice and >found nothing but generalities and a degree of vagueness unusual even for >the web.
That info would not be released into the general domain as it would no doubt be very sensitive for Kodak, and the ex-employee will be bound by non-disclosure agreements? We would love to be able to see the nuts and bolts of it but unless it goes to court, I doubt it will come out. Even then, there probably will be reporting restrictions. You might have to literally sit in the court and listen - if it gets that far. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
