To be honest I haven't run it and when I do I find I don't trust it. In the
end, the "Before" view looks better then the "After" view.
Tom C.
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PESO - Dash
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:31:56 -0500
Did you run Adobe Gamma? The default only works if the screen is somewhat
calibrated. No need to be nuts about it and buy a calibrator Adobe Gamma
will get you close enough for hobby work, but I have found that most
monitors (or video cards actually) are set way too bright as they come.
I set my monitor to minimum brightness and maximum contrast and adjust the
video card rather than us the sliders in Adobe Gamma to give an on screen
gamma of 2.2. That calibrates the system. If I have to view a 1.8 gamma
image I just turn the monitor brightness up to about 3 and it is close with
out messing up the calibration otherwise.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Tom C wrote:
I'm on a Windows PC. Photoshop Help says that images created in PS 5.0 or
later use a gamma value of 2.2 by default.
Tom C.
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PESO - Dash
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:12:20 -0500
Ah! As they should be. Apple uses the 1.8 standard because that was the
best the original MacIntosh could do, I understand.
I do not know what Tom is using but if it is not a Mac his gamma setting
is off quite a bit. Even if it is a Mac, he ought to set the gamma at 2.2
for web images.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if you were addressing me or Tom, but my Apple monitors
are all running at 2.2.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Interesting, as I know you use an Apple. Because when I turn my monitor
up to 1.8 gamma the photo shows that separation. At 2.2 it does look
under exposed.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty dog. Nice shot. On my work monitor, which is only roughly
calibrated,
it seems to lack shadow detail in that the eyes don't separate out from
the hair very well. A little tweak of black level might be called for,
but I can't say for sure with this monitor. In any case, a good grab.
Paul
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I went for a walk with our Border Collie last weekend. It's rare she
goes on a walk with just me and without our other dog (the alpha).
Anyway...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4279519
