On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 05:03:53 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:48 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Thank you. The two buildings shown are roughly a hundred years apart.
Have those years brought any improvements in architecture? Have the
last two thousand years? Save for the Taj Mahal, can any later
building compare with the Parthenon?
I think I might find the Parthenon a touch drafty as a domicile or
office, eh?
Perhaps. But there's more to architecture than domiciles and offices.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
