Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday.
And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total
crap, but
it sure is very muddy looking.
Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that
left office
by accident.
When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was
obsessed by
getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at
general
"picture".
Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but
simply
forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm
not proud
of that either.
The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and
photoshopping.
Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also
have to
give me a warm "we all do mistakes" hug.
(I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil
people and
will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-))
When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for
the
right moment, trying to get it right "in camera" (if the bird is still
there).
Tim, the Muddy Norwegian.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580
This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same
standpoint, and from the same "session".
The result is a "new" head ;-) and a improved(?) composition.
This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS.
So I would really appreciate some comments on the result.
Whatdoyuahthink?
What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or
different?
Does it look "real"?
And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble?
(The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.)
A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
