> > From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/04/04 Tue AM 04:45:05 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: > Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? > > If so, I nominate this one.
I restrained myself this time, Tim, although I think I did some serious internal damage. 8-)) > > > On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > > > I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. > > > > And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total > > crap, but > > it sure is very muddy looking. > > Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that > > left office > > by accident. > > > > When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was > > obsessed by > > getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at > > general > > "picture". > > > > Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but > > simply > > forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm > > not proud > > of that either. > > > > The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and > > photoshopping. > > > > Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also > > have to > > give me a warm "we all do mistakes" hug. > > (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil > > people and > > will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) > > > > When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for > > the > > right moment, trying to get it right "in camera" (if the bird is still > > there). > > > > > > Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red > >> > >> I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. > >> http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 > >> This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same > >> standpoint, and from the same "session". > >> > >> The result is a "new" head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. > >> This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. > >> So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. > >> > >> Whatdoyuahthink? > >> What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or > >> different? > >> Does it look "real"? > >> And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? > >> (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) > >> > >> A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? > >> > >> > >> Tim > >> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > >> > >> Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > >> (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
