> > From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/04/05 Wed AM 01:55:00 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions) > > It's okay, Lon, my own camera doesn't display this problem.
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else? > > I meant how do you cure the camera, not how to get rid of them in post -- I'm > doing stuff where speed of turnaround requires very little or no post work. > > -Aaron There's no cure for it, except in postprocessing. Although, if you really have a "clean" sensor, you could swap that between bodies. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions) > Date: Tue Apr 4, 2006 6:06 pm > Size: 491 bytes > To: [email protected] > > The bad pixels are "built in" to your sensor, and everyone has them in a > different location. It's not hard to make a photoshop action that will > minimize them at a certain capture size. Email me for details. > > -Lon > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > Dave, that's from your D. The spots I'm asking about are on the player's > > chin, on the jersey logo and on the Nikon sign. So they're not dust -- how > > does one get these bad pixels in the first place, and how does one get rid > > of them? > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
