It's not at all hard to accept. And I would shoot jpeg in your situation as well, given the serious time constraints. We didn't initially know that you use digital only for high volume shooting in stadium lighting. Some who are picking up this thread in the early posts, still don't know. So it's nothing to get worked up about. I was initially surprised that you don't shoot RAW because I know you're an experienced processor, who produces excellent work. Like others, I assumed you used digital for a variety of different things. Now that I understand the circumstances, I understand why you shoot jpeg. Paul
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:38 PM, John Forbes wrote: > > > The question was: Do you REALLY never make an error with exposure? > > > > If the answer is yes, then go on shootig JPEG. If, on the other hand, > > you are human, you might be better off with RAW. :-) > > In 22 games last season I did not change the exposure dial and I did > not make an error in exposure. Why is it hard to accept that the > stadium is lit for TV and that the exposures never change? > > -Aaron >
