On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:

Dave, I remember my first impression when I was faced with Norwegian Landscapes. No matter how wide a lens I took, the view in the viewfinder looked not-damn-wide-enough.

I think this is the case here. It is extremely wide, I reckon, yet it looks very tranquil and hence the dramatic width is rather lost.

The situation was against me: if I'd attempted to change lenses I'd have ended up either injured or drowned, as I'd have had to let go of the handrail and attempt to venture into the front of the boat where my camera bag was stored. We're talking maybe a 15ft boat going at least 30mph on choppy water. No time to feel seasick as you're having too much fun trying to stay upright. That ride really was a blast.

I know what you mean about those big landscapes. It is very very difficult to capture the sheer enormity of some places...
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?t=1&p=63

As a side note, I would have probably taken few more images with slightly different positions of the horizon.

Unfortunately the situation was against me once again. That was the last shot on the roll, and changing film was not going to happen. If I'd included more foreground it would have been at the expense of the sky, and it probably would have been motion-blurred and full of spray.

- Dave

Reply via email to