I read it at the newsstand, after reading about the article on
DPReview.com. They seemed to like it. I don't trust their ratings,
but based on Paul's rating I'd say they got it right for once.
Godfrey
On Apr 13, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I know how everyone so looks forward to reports of POP PHOTO
articles..not. Can't resist.
May issue gives a gushing review of the 'subject' lens including
comments re how much you would sacrifice if you were to chose the
Sigma
10-20 instead. Unusual to read such, I think.
It's referenced as a "Wide Winner" both from the standpoint of image
quality and virtually imperceptible distortion.
It's good reading.
