Paul Stenquist wrote: > This is a little too large to view on my 1680 x 1050 screen. > It's an interesting look at an attractive area, but it > doesn't really grab me. > It looks a bit soft, almost like an unsharpened digital. It > might also benefit from more saturation and contrast.
> > http://uk.geocities.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/imgp3999.jpg Thanks for the comments - here's the story behind it, apart from mainly a quick test of some web space and PDML postings coming in (I haven't seen my original posting yet). A few days ago, I walked through the forest and noticed two places I wanted to take a picture of. One was the obelisk itself, the other a tree shaped almost seat like, which I played in when I was a child and children still do today. I went up there this morning with the *ist D and both of these areas had been freshly sprayed with obscene graffiti. Lesson 1, always carry a camera. The picture I took was grabbed on return to the car, more as a reminder to return in better light and the digital camera works more like a notebook. I'll return in a few days when the children are back at school, and see if I can make a better job of this - assuming these hooligans haven't returned with more paint. Malcolm
