I have no doubt it's better than no calibration.
Tom C.
From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Monitor color adjust
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:10:56 +0800
Maybe so. But since I started using the Spyder2, my prints now look
like what's on screen.
Before then, making a print was a trial & error process.
Dave S
On 4/19/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kills me, reading between the lines, is that buying one of these
things
> does not neccesarially mean one's monitor will be calibrated properly.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: OT: Monitor color adjust
> >Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:33:57 +1000
> >
> >On 18 Apr 2006 at 18:03, David Mann wrote:
> >
> > > About the only page I could find that had a useful comparison was
this:
> > > http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/monitor_calibration_tools.htm
> > >
> > > The Monaco and G-M systems seem to be pretty close. The comments
> > > about the highlights discouraged me from looking at the Spyder2.
> >
> >It seems like an unnecessary beat-up to me.
> >
> >
> >Rob Studdert
> >HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> >Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> >UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> >Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
> >
>
>
>
