I know I have an X23. But those have P3-M and NOT a Pentium-M, which quite a different beast.
On 4/18/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, it won't run on my IBM Thinkpad X24 with its Pentium III-M. > However there are windows managers out there that will give the look and > feel of OSX with Linux or BSD, so I may wind up running one of them > eventually. > > In the mean time I have to get more ram so I can run PS-CS2 (won't even > load with 256mb). And a larger hard drive so I can dual boot XPP and > Linux. Then I need a CD-ROM or DVD drive I can boot from (my old HP USB > CD-Writer apparently does not have the firmware to boot from it). And of > course wireless so I can connect hither and yon, although I already have > a nifty 3com Xjack 802.11b PC-Card coming. > > Gee, and I thought the X24 was such a bargain at $275 when I bought it > off ebay a couple weeks ago. But then, 3lb-6.9oz, according to the PO's > scale, and 11 x 8.9 x 1.2 inches is so nice. Came loaded with XP Pro > SP2, with a current COA, and Office 2000 as well. And this thing has a > compact-flash slot so I can load the photos from my digital directly. > > When I first heard of OSX-86 I was excited. Too bad it won't run on the > PIII-M, it would be like having a Powerbook for under $300. Somehow I > believe I can live without it though <GRIN>. > > (Did I say I finally have a laptop again?) > > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > ----------------------------------- > > > Thibouille wrote: > > To be precise, OSX for x86 will run on any CPU which as SSE2 > > capability which means Pentium4, Pentium-M/Centrino,Athlon64/Sempron > > and newer. > > > > Of course many components won't have drivers so you won't be able to > > use a numbers of things, sadly. But it could be nice to try and see > > the feeling or whatever reason you might have. > > > > On 4/18/06, Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Interesting post from the ProRental list. > >> > >> Powell > >> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:16:31 -0400 > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: [ProRental] Windows on a Mac and vice versa... > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >> > >> I assume all of you are aware that you can go the other direction as well. > >> OS-X (Intel version) will load and run (with a surprisingly small amount > >> of work) on newer non-Mac Intel PC's with no glitches. While Apple has > >> been good about making the ability to load Windows on the Intel Macs > >> available (the information was already widely dispersed on the internet), > >> their lawyers have been equally busy trying to stem the proliferation of > >> the information that the reverse is available. You'll find some of the > >> sites that had this information now have "link removed at the request of > >> Apple's Legal Department." Best possible case, however, is that this is > >> simply a delaying tactic. There's really not much of a problem finding the > >> files you need. > >> > >> But OS-X (intel) has been running on, for example, common Dell laptops > >> since at least August of last year, when some folks got the Developer's Kit > >> version up and running. No problems, no glitches. > >> > >> So for those early adopters and those tired of waiting for Apple Intel > >> laptops, or those who want lower prices or greater variety, etc., and who > >> have a bit of computer savvy, the opportunity is there to have three > >> systems (Linux, Windows and OS-X) running on your system, with the choice > >> available at boot time. > >> > >> david > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------- > > Thibouille > > ---------------------- > > *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ... > > > > > > -- ---------------------- Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
