Bob Shell wrote: >> Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant. >> On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato", since I >>> strongly suspected that :-) > >You know, saying "largely it is not potato" probably should be "for >the most part, it is not potato". That would imply that some part of >it is, indeed, potato.
They're probably saying this because they expect this camera to have appeal.
