Bob, I use "Save for Web" when I'm posting PUGs, or posting PESOs on photo.net. Both require jpgs with the metadata stripped--i.e. saved for web. The original scanned files on my computer are TIFFs; at the moment the ist D output is highest-quality jpgs, but I'll probably give RAW a try in the next month or so.
Rick --- Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't save for the web! > Seriously, aren't these much smaller jpeg's? > I keep my pix full size and save that way as 1.3-1.5 > meg jpegs. > If I resize, I shoot for a max of 800 pixels wide or > 600 pixels tall, > then use a good quality setting to get a 200K+ file. > I think 200K files are not too mush to share with > those on broadband. > Bottom line, think bigger...space is cheap. > Regards, Bob S. > > On 4/20/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Last evening I was going through pix taken with my > > new-to-me ist D with my new Photoshop Elements 4, > and > > two questions arose: > > > > 1. I was shooting in Hyper-Program/aperture > priority > > mode (having used the thumbwheel to select the > > aperture). The EXIF data (File/File info/Photo > data) > > includes the aperture but not the shutter speed. > In > > PE2 both parameters were there. What's going on? > > > > 2. Several photos looked great when I opened them, > but > > when I ran "Save for Web" they brightened > considerably > > and lost saturation and contrast. That didn't > happen > > in PE2. Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rick > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
