I would rotate to straighten the deck and then use "transform" to
straighten the light pole.
Paul
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'd have been the first had I seen the pic before Paul <LOL>
I played around a bit with the rotation and settled on a 0.04 degree
rotation, which looks pretty good to these old eyes. At 0.05 degrees
I'm
starting to see, or feel, the lamp tilting the other way.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: 4/21/2006 4:28:49 PM
Subject: Re: PAW 2006 - 04 - GDG
LOL ... I was wondering who would be the first to suggest rotation.
;-)
It's hard to judge. I've used the edge of the wharf as a reference
line and Photoshop suggests -.09 degree rotation. If I use the
horizon, it suggests -.2 degrees. Problem is that when I do the
rotation, it looks like it's leaning the other way as the lamp and
bench fool the eye.
G
On Apr 21, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Interesting in its minimalism. But this is such a geometric
composition that I think it requires complete accuracy. It appears
to need a counterclockwise rotation of about half a degree.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/04.htm
