On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel I shouldn't just dump PESOs out there without making a few comments on > others'. But a bit busy with Mom. However, I'll try to make some comments > soon. > > Again, following Bruce's suggestions for camera settings for the Monterey Bay > Aquarium, I shot a lot of jelly fish. I felt there should have been some slow > classical music on the background, maybe a waltz, to go a long with their > graceful, slow movement. > > None are super sharp, but some are a tad sharper than others. I may throw up > a jellyfish gallery next week. The have a tad more impact when taken together, > and they would also probably display well on that way too. Say, a group of > four or so. > > 1600, 50mm, 2.8, about 1/15 of a second, and accidentally shot JPG rather > than RAW (because the no flash setting on my camera did that without my > awareness > of it) > > This is not the sharpest, not the worse, not the best, but I liked the > juxtaposition of the two. > > Remember shot through, glass, water, and with a large f stop. > > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/jellies.htm > > Comments, welcome.
Gorgeous composition and beautiful, saturated colours. Spectacular photo! cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
