very good thread and probably very useful for designing an archival storage system for digital media.
I have a sub-poll: how many of those who primarily shoot digital think it's a good idea to also invest time and money in retaining an 'analog' (print/transparency) copy of your photos in a suitable archive? I find this attractive because, unlike digital storage, analog storage will likely degrade but not be destroyed barring fire/other calamity. Some (fuzzy and faded) memories are better than no memories. On 4/27/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it has to do with computer experience rather than production > levels. >
