Why do you insist on this kind of falderal, John?
G
On May 4, 2006, at 4:13 PM, John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:42:15 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What point is there in considering versions of DNG Converter and
Camera
It's quite simple, Godfrey. (If you pause for a micro-second to
think.)
He might have an earlier version. He might have access to an
earlier version. He might have been offered an earlier version.
His computer at work might have an earlier version.
His girlfriend/boyfriend/probation officer/shrink/wife/husband/
father/mother/daughter/son you-name-it might have an earlier version.
There is a piece of doggerel (actually a Clerihew) concerning
another very superior person: George Nathaniel Curzon (Viceroy of
India). I commend it to you.
......................... if you are thinking of moving to DNG
format now/in the future? That's like saying, "I'd like to
consider one of the new IBM ThinkPads, but ya know the IBM PC/AT
had a rather bad reliability record."
So you shouldn't consider a product's reliability record?
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
