So, after what seems like more than a year of photographing this woman, have you learned her name?
This pic appears to be loaded with JPEG artifacts. Good to know that you like the 20~35. Right now it's a toss-up for me if that or the FA35/2.0 will be my next lens purchase. Both seem to be well regarded. And while I don't care much for zooms, the short zoom is one that is of greatest interest. Shel > [Original Message] > From: P. J. Alling > I was going back over some shots from a while back, and came across this > one. It's another informal portrait. The web conversion doesn't do it > justice, you can count the eyelashes on high magnification. The FA20-35 > is just incredibly sharp, and anyone who thinks that the *ist-D doesn't > produce sharp images hasn't really used the camera. Anyway here it is: > > http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_cnongrl4.html
