Bob Sullivan wrote: >So does this mean TV is engaged?
That's what he claims. > >On 5/16/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mike wilson wrote: >> >> >Mark Roberts wrote: >> >> >> http://www.romanphotography.com/bcc/ >> > >> >http://www.romanphotography.com/bcc/bcc0011.htm >> > >> >Nice catch! (I mean the picture 8-) >> >> Well you certainly couldn't be referring to Tom! ;-) >> >>
