You completely misread the humor in my intent. Explaining it is a waste of time.
G On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Tom C wrote: > *You're* reaction is more of "the sky is falling". > > My post neither had that tone nor was meant to imply that tone. > Nor am I > worried about not being able to use a digital camera. > Nevertheless, I found > the article interesting and my response was tongue-in-cheek, along > the lines > of an anti-anti-missle-missile. > > > Tom C. > > >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Digital Camera Blocking Technology >> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:47:47 -0700 >> >> This nonsense has been emailed around several times already. >> The Sky Is Faling! Film Is Essential! >> >> Now what's that thing that PJ has as his signature? >> >> "If you're troubled or in doubt >> run in circles, scream and shout!" >> >> G >> >> On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> A digital camera detector blocker is in order... or maybe just film. >>> http://upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060619-062742-6349r >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
