In a message dated 6/17/2006 9:38:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The jpeg is as good as I could get it. The white lids with hot sun on them were solid gone, but the shadow detail was full retrievable with the RAW. With the jpeg it took a lot of bodging and it stinks. But the level of detail in the RAW amazed me. That instantly sold me back onto RAW.
Of course, there's no way my inkjet can cope with showing that detail, but that's another story. Some facts: jpeg file on card 5MB, RAW is 8 MB. I'm down from 300-odd jpegs per 2 GB card to 187 at 200 ISO. Time for some more cards :-( And time to pull Bruce's book off the shelf and have another go. Some pass me a desert fork.... ========= Cotty, YOU HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!!! Hehehehehehehe. For shadow detail alone I decided to use RAW. Soon after I realized there was also much more than that. Hallelujah. Praise the pixels. The boy has seen the light. Marnie aka Doe ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
