I think you need to read Godfrey's reply.....

On 6/19/06, Martin Trautmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-06-19 12:02, Perry Pellechia wrote:
> > How do you know that these improvement can be implemented with just a
> > firmware upgrade?   Where did you find this information?
>
> It's within the documents, both referenced and quoted below.
>
> Once again: "image quality is even higher [...] due to upgraded firmware"
>
> They name *firmware*, not *hardware*. There may be other reasons why a
> firmware upgrade is not done for *istD. As long as someone else does not
> name better sources, you might even guess that a *istD upgrade is
> prevented in order to justify higher K10* sales.
>
> > On 6/19/06, Martin Trautmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 2006-06-09 15:31, Simon King wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> > Just in case this isn't already known by all, here's a fact sheet on SR
> >> > & other K10d features.
> >> > <http://www.pentaxslr.com/images/SHAKE_REDUCTION_FACT SHEET.pdf>
> >>
> >> What I learn from the doc: Pentax does not mind about former users,
> >> upgrading their firmware?
> >>
> >> So even if Pentax knew about solutions to improve picture quality, they do
> >> not necessarily take the effort to make upgrades?
> >>
> >> :  Is the CCD identical with the one used in *ist D-series models?
> >> :: Yes, it is.
> >> :
> >> :  Are there any improvements in image quality over *ist D-series models?
> >> :
> >> :: Yes, the K100D's image quality is even higher than that offered by the
> >> :: *ist D series due to upgraded firmware.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
<---------------------------------------------------->
Perry Pellechia

Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
<---------------------------------------------------->

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to