Hey John ... You did good, regardless. It's comforting for some of us to know that the camera really exists, that it's functional, and works . In time, more news will come out, you'll have a chance to see or use other samples ...
Shel > [Original Message] > From: John Celio >> It's possible to do even better than that - if the motion detectors > > include accelerometers then the stabilization logic could smooth out > > wobbles while maintaining the same average pan rate. > > I wish this question had been brought up when the rep was still at my shop. > He had his K100D with him (which I got to play with) and I could have > snooped around the menu had I thought of it. It was a preproduction model, > however, so I'm not sure how accurate my findings would have been. > > By the way, he showed me some slow-speed shots he took at a wedding > recently. One was as slow as 1/3 sec, hand held, and it showed very little > blur for such a slow speed. The shots at 1/10 and 1/15 were better, of > course, but all in all, the Shake Reduction worked very well for that > particular situation (he was using the 18-55mm, btw). I wish I could have > done some closer inspections of the photos, but since I was at work, I had > to, y'know, work. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
