> I'm curious, too. I shoot weddings quite a bit, and I don't even pack > my Tamron 90 macro lens most of the time. About the only shot that > even comes close to needing a macro is something to do with the rings. > And for that, several other Pentax lenses focus close enough. > It's sort of been mentioned on this thread before, but let's not forget that the lens in question also can do other things than focusing close. And rather well, if it's anything like my F-100 macro. After I bought this lens used last year, everyone here said I was going to love it, so I stubbornly tried to dislike it, but found that I couldn't ;-) It's by far the lens I've used most since I got it, and most of the shots are actually not macro. I think it is really nice "on the street", for instance. I also rather like the "feel" of this lens, but that's going to be different with the D-FA... > Of course, if you are just using the wedding as an excuse to pick up a > lens you want, then I fully understand. > He, he...
- T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
