Someone stated here that the information taken from your site had initially been taken from a magazine article by you, and that you really aren't the copyright holder in the first place. Is that correct?
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Mark Roberts > >>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7625052222&ru=http://se arch.ebay.com:80/7625052222_W0QQfromZR40QQfviZ > > Update: Well, I finally got eBay to remove the copyright-infringing > listing. Here's the ordeal: As you would expect if you know eBay at > all, it took a long time to find the relevant section of their web > site. They've succeeded in hiding it very well... but not well enough > :) Then, all intellectual property claims must be filed via *fax*, not > email. So I downloaded their PDF form, filled in out completely and > faxed it to them. Next I get an email saying they can't address my > claim because I didn't give the item number of the infringing listing. > I double-checked the fax I sent and found that I *did* include the > item number - right on the page they specified and in the correct > location. With the appropriate "reason code". So I email back and > point this out to them. The next day I received another email stating > that they can't address my claim because I only gave 9 digits of the > item number instead of all 10. I go back and look at the original fax > and, as you may have guessed, they're wrong again: I gave all 10 > digits (and they are the correct ones for the item in question). I > send another "no, you're wrong, I did everything right the first time" > message. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
