>From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I feel the PUG because it stays around forever, should be used as a >showcase for list members best work. In this day and age of easy >Internet posting of photos it does not make sense to use a permanent >gallery to post work-shots. When you want to know what others think of >your shot and/or how to improve it posting a temporary image as a PESO >is more appropriate. >
The way I feel. >If the subject restriction is holding back folks from submitting to the >PUG, maybe we should change that to just "my best shot" instead. There is alway the "Open Gallery" section. >Changes >of format and size are a matter for the maintainers. They are the ones >who have to do the work. However, after saying that, in todays age of >higher bandwidths, maybe somewhat larger images are called for, >especially if it is to be a showcase gallery of what can be done with >Pentax gear. Another thought is limiting it to X number of images per >month, first come first served. That may make it easier for the >maintainers and limit the maximum bandwidth required with larger photos. >Also being a bit of a competition to get your image in early might >generate more urgency to submit a PUG image. > It could also backfire because of the hurry. >I do not feel there should be any judgment of the images other than the >photographers them selves feeling it is some of their best work. When >there is a group who judge entries the gallery tends to become very >one-sided showing images the judges like, and people tend to produce >images that are copies of previous winners. I kind of feel that stymies >creativity. > Maybe... maybe not. If a panel of 3 had to vote on each image and those persons were of significantly varied 'photo genres' on might get a good cross-section. I don't think it'll ever fly anyway, but I still don't mind the idea. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

