Great comments Jostein. On 6/24/06, Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Your words, "let it die peacefully" should be all the incentive > > we need if we wish not to lose the PUG. > > A bit of a reality check. > > Keeping the PUG warm as a topic of discussion, or preferrably, keeping > the IMAGES in the PUG a topic of discussion, is the only way to keep > it going. As long as there's a broad base of interest, it's good. > > No offence to you, Don, but there must be a lower threshold of > interested people below which it is not worthwhile to do it for the > community. In my honest opinion, the PUG should have a broad base of > supporters on the PDML to be allowed to be "the gallery of the PDML". > > Now, before anyone gets the wrong idea, I think PUG is a nice concept. > It has been one of the best things about PDML for many years. > > But to keep it alive, a lot of people have to take an interest in it. > Not just a handful, as it is now. > > Jostein > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
