> >>> SB> However, it doesn't do well
when asked to render fine detail.
> >>> Compared to
> >>> SB> an A50/1.4 or a K35/2.0, the DA 16-50 does not fare well. I was
> >>> SB> disappointed in the results it produced here
> >>>
> >>> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/jeans/rumpledjeans_2.html
> >>>
> >>> SB> and here
> >>>
> >>> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/hood_3096.jpg
> >>>
> >>> SB> In order to generate acceptable sharpness and detail these pics
> >>> had to
> >>> SB> receive quite a bit more sharpening than similar pics made with
> >>> the prime
> >>> SB> lenses I mentioned. > >>>
I find i need to sharpen my istD shots a LOT more than my Nikon shots,
especially with the
16-45. Possibly due to the
difference in "basic" setups,?? as i have all my cameras set to.
Go expodisk, Go.
Dave
> >>> SB> Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
