Amita Guha wrote: > > I picked up this lens last week as a travel lens. It looked like the > lens was focusing poorly or something, so I returned it for a new one, > and I'm getting the same results - the images from it are very soft. > > Does anyone else have experience with this lens, and is this typical > performance for it? At this point I'm thinking of picking up the Sigma > 55-200 to see if it's any better. I realize the DA 50-200 is a cheap > lens, but I can't tolerate that level of softness. > > Thanks, > Amita >
Hey - thanks for posting this query - as I was thinking that range was something I might like better than the 18-55 - doesn't sound like I should bother... ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
