Ann Sanfedele wrote: >Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > >>Great! The 18-55 is somewhat underrated based on the few pics I've made >>with one, which was back when I got my first DS. See my review of the DA >>16-45. The 18-55 would be just a little more of the same. I do like it's >>somewhat longer reach than the 16-45, makes the lens just a little more >>useful for me, but I like the wider end on the 16-45, which, yesterday, I >>discovered, while very handy, still isn't wide enough. >> >>IAC, congrats and good luck with Tri-State and the camera. >> >>Shel >> >> >> > >I've never shot anything wider than 28mm with film - I'm >more of a get in closer >kinda shooter - so the 18-55 for an fairly inexpesnsive >starting auto lens should be fine. > >can't wait to get the beast now that I've taken the plunge > >thanks for the suggestions and "review" > >ann > > > The 18-55 is actually pretty good. It's a 28-80 equivalent, and offers quite good manual focus feel (Especially compared to the competition's 18-55's).
-Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
