Based on Print sizes and Megapixels, I made a little test with my film scanner. I scanned an image that had a huge amount of detail. First at 5400 dpi and then 2700 dpi. The 2700 was downsized to match a 6mp image and then upsized to match the original. You can see the results here:
http://www.users.on.net/~bobrapp/test/pictures.html I am still torn between a digital scanner or a Miccrotek 120tf and start using my 67 and Horseman again. With digital, I can take heaps of pictures and with film, I feel that I have some satisfaction. I keep negatives but hardly any images off of the Oly (which I think is excellent). Cheers, Bob Rapp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have upsized RAW conversions from my 7 mp C7070 and they look great. > But if the subject contains significant minute detail, I would prefer the > scanned version. > FWIW I use a Minolta Scan-Elite 5400 (first version) with Silverfast > AI. > I scan at 16-bit 5400 with the diffuser and GANE noise reduction and > sharpen > is CS. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
