I've not used PSE3-4 more than a couple of times at the store. It  
does allow use of Camera Raw v3.4, which is very good, but then again  
it does not allow access to anything but the basic features... I  
don't think it does batch conversions although I could be wrong.

PSE3-4 costs about $80 at street pricing, where RAW Developer costs  
about $100 and is more full featured as a RAW conversion application.  
RAW Developer does allow batch conversion and is pretty efficient at  
it. I find that its *default* settings are often better than Camera  
Raw's ... They can both be made to do the same thing, but for those  
who want to spend the minimum time tailoring conversion adjustments,  
it might produce a better result in less time.

As you might imagine, I'm quite impressed with RAW Developer based on  
my testing. My biggest issue is not whether it's good but how well I  
could integrate it into my image processing workflow. Photoshop CS2 +  
Bridge + Camera Raw is a very compelling set of tools that gets LOTs  
of work done very efficiently.

Godfrey

On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I meant only  in comparison to using the plug-in converter with  
> PhotoShop 7. The software Godfrey suggested and other alternatives  
> might be better. But the RAW Converter for Elements is reportedly  
> quite close in capability to the version used with PSCS.
>
>> For what reason, Paul?
>>
>>> In terms of a RAW Converter, I think you'd be better off with PS
>>> Elements 3 or 4.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to