I like the focus on the wings and the play of light - didn't
notice the head being slightly
soft until Shel pointed it out... 

It would probably matter for a stock photo for a nature
magazine that is producing
photos for identification - but not otherwise, I think... 

I'd like him a bit less centered - but that is a nit

ann

Paul Stenquist wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure what you're looking at. The 72 megapixel version at 100%
> is in focus head to tail on my monitor. The shutter speed and aperture
> are what is necessary to achieve this shot handheld.
> Paul
> On Jun 25, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> 
> > Sorry Paul, it just doesn't work.  Focus is lost as you move from tail
> > to
> > head. Perhaps a smaller aperture and slower shutter speed might have
> > helped, maybe focusing a little more towards the middle of the
> > creature ...
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Paul Stenquist
> >
> >> Two from the garden this afternoon. Both with the Sigma 500 Super and
> >> Kirk Flash Xtender
> >>
> >> *istD, A400/5/6, ISO 400 f6.7, 1/1000th:
> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4607616&size=lg
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to