I've already got a machine that should be much more powerful than the
new OS supposedly needs. It's not hardware that needs upgrading.
mike wilson wrote:
>P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>
>>You could be right, I just became so disgusted with XP that I've done
>>nothing more with the interface. If someone needs software I write it
>>on my Win2K box and test it on their systems. Usually the stuff I've
>>been doing lately works without a hitch, so I haven't cared. When the
>>WinXP replacement comes along I guess I'll have to upgrade something.
>>
>>
>
>Start with your hardware. My brother tried the Beta on a min spec
>machine. It would start. Just.
>
>
>
>>Eric Featherstone wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 27/06/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>What version of WinXP. I tried to do that on a couple of peoples
>>>>machines for them early on and it proved to be impossible...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hi Peter,
>>>
>>>No problem on XP Pro for me. But note that there is a an option to
>>>choose "Classic" from right clicking on the desktop and choosing
>>>properties (i.e. same as Display Properties from the control panel),
>>>and a _seperate_ option to choose "Classic" by right clicking on the
>>>task bar and choosing properties then Start menu. I think it is this
>>>latter one you might not have done.
>>>
>>>Eric.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
